About Table Scraps

Table Scraps is a blog maintained by Bailey Norwood, one of the editors of Food & Resource Dialogues. It's purpose is to explore what is happening in the world of agriculture, food and resources; to discover topics that would make interesting FRD articles; to help readers understand different perspectives on controversial topicsincluding why intelligent people form different opinions; and to experiment with different ways of applying economics to contemporary topics.

The entries in Table Scraps are not peer-reviewed items of research, nor do they represent the views of anyone in particular (not even the blog's author!).

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Who corrupts: the lobbyist or the politician?

[Table Scraps, leaning neither to the political right nor the left, says]

Yesterday's The Wall Street Journal makes the following mention of a new report on the monetary payoff of lobbying and funding campaigns:

In a report to be released Tuesday by the Manhattan Institute, economist (and former senior Clinton Administration official) Rob Shapiro and co-author Douglas Dowson sort through the academic literature and find that "corporate political efforts generally have positive effects on a firm's market value and its shareholder returns."
...
Mr. Shapiro and Mr. Dowson looked at studies covering corporate political spending from 1974 to 2011, when most corporate political spending flowed through political action committees. Not surprisingly, the heaviest political spending was done by companies in industries that were heavily regulated, highly concentrated or when they received much of their revenue from government.
--The Wall Street Journal.  June 18, 2012.  "Political Spending Pays."  A12.



It will be interesting to see where food & ag corporations fall in this study, as they are certainly heavily regulated.

Also, let us not neglect that fact that it is often the politician who corrupts the corporation. If I may be cynical, economists sometimes view regulations as a threat to corporations, where politicians will less the regulations or at least not strengthen them, so long as they donate money to the politician's campaigns. If this sounds far-fetched, consider the following quotes.



I’ve had conversations with Democrat givers out here in the Bay area, and I’ll tell you, you won’t believe the requests their getting [that is, requests of lobbyists from politicians].  The opening ante is a million dollars…that’s sort of the baseline.  This is unprecedented.  And, in fact, one thing that John [McCain] and I experienced was that sometimes the corporations that didn’t like this system would come to us and say, “You know, it’s not legalized bribery, it’s legalized extortion.”  Because it’s not like the company CEO calls up and says, “Gee, I’d love to give you some money.”  It’s usually the other way around.  The politician or their agent who’s got the superpac: they’re the ones calling up and asking for the money…
—Russ Feingold.  “Take the Money and Run for Office.”  This American Life.  National Public Radio.  April 1, 2012.

Jacob:  Alex, you’ve been doing these pieces on lobbying for a while now, and what’s been illuminating to me is how much the Congress people themselves need these fundraisers.  They need this constant flow of money to get reelected...
Alex:  Yeh, you know a lot of people think of all these lobbyists, that they’re bum-rushing Congress, throwing money at them and trying to corrupt them with their money, but [lobbyist] Jimmy Williams says it’s the other way around:  Congress people were constantly pestering him.  They were constantly calling, and a lot of time it was Congressmen whose votes he didn’t even need.
Planet Money podcast.  “A Former Lobbyist Tells All.”  January 27, 2012.